2009 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 794 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Daewoo Matiz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Daewoo Matiz (50 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Daewoo Matiz weights approximately 46 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Daewoo Matiz | 1952 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Saab |
| Model | Matiz | 92 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 794 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 851 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2480 mm |
