2009 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1954 Rover P4
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,230 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Rover P4 (80 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (50 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Rover P4 should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Rover P4 weights approximately 633 kg more than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Rover P4 (153 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1954 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Daewoo Matiz | 1954 Rover P4 | |
Make | Daewoo | Rover |
Model | Matiz | P4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 2230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 851 kg | 1484 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 52 L |