2009 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 794 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Daewoo Matiz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Daewoo Matiz (50 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Daewoo Matiz weights approximately 191 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Daewoo Matiz | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Daewoo | DAF |
| Model | Matiz | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 794 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 851 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 33 L |
