2009 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1969 Mini MK III
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mini MK III would be higher. At 1,274 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Mini MK III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mini MK III (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (50 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mini MK III should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Daewoo Matiz weights approximately 206 kg more than 1969 Mini MK III.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Mini MK III (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1969 Mini MK III will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Daewoo Matiz | 1969 Mini MK III | |
Make | Daewoo | Mini |
Model | Matiz | MK III |
Year Released | 2009 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 1274 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 851 kg | 645 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2040 mm |