2009 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1987 Lada Samara
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,100 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Lada Samara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Lada Samara (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (50 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Lada Samara should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Lada Samara weights approximately 74 kg more than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Daewoo Matiz | 1987 Lada Samara | |
Make | Daewoo | Lada |
Model | Matiz | Samara |
Year Released | 2009 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 1100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 60.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
Top Speed | 144 km/hour | 140 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 17 seconds | 17 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 851 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 43 L |