2009 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (50 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 896 kg more than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Daewoo Matiz | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Daewoo | Dodge |
Model | Matiz | Dakota |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 851 kg | 1747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 76 L |