2009 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2005 Ford Five Hundred
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Five Hundred. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Five Hundred would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Five Hundred is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Five Hundred (203 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Five Hundred should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Five Hundred weights approximately 859 kg more than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Five Hundred (281 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Five Hundred will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. 2005 Ford Five Hundred has automatic transmission and 2009 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 2009 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Five Hundred will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Daewoo Matiz | 2005 Ford Five Hundred | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Matiz | Five Hundred |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 203 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.5 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 871 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 72 L |