2009 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. At 1,124 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Daewoo Matiz (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (54 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 579 kg more than 2009 Daewoo Matiz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (100 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2010 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Daewoo Matiz | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Daewoo | Mitsubishi |
Model | Matiz | Colt |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 54 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.5 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 152 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.7 seconds | 13.3 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 871 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.4 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 47 L |