2009 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2004 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Explorer weights approximately 626 kg more than 2009 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Daewoo Rezzo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Explorer (325 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Rezzo. (142 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Daewoo Rezzo | 2004 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Rezzo | Explorer |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 325 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 1973 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 85 L |