2009 Daihatsu Charade vs. 1995 Pontiac Firehawk
To start off, 2009 Daihatsu Charade is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Pontiac Firehawk would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Daihatsu Charade, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Pontiac Firehawk (464 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daihatsu Charade. (94 Nm). This means 1995 Pontiac Firehawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daihatsu Charade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Daihatsu Charade | 1995 Pontiac Firehawk | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Pontiac |
| Model | Charade | Firehawk |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 5735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 464 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3480 mm | 4980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 54 L |
