2009 Daihatsu Charade vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 2009 Daihatsu Charade is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Helem. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Helem would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 442 more horse power than 2009 Daihatsu Charade. (68 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 2009 Daihatsu Charade.
Because 1997 Renault Helem is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Renault Helem. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Daihatsu Charade, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Daihatsu Charade (94 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 2009 Daihatsu Charade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Daihatsu Charade | 1997 Renault Helem | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Renault |
| Model | Charade | Helem |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 2975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 510 HP |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 80 L |
