2009 Daihatsu Copen vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Daihatsu Copen is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Daihatsu Copen (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Daihatsu Copen should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 2 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2009 Daihatsu Copen.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 2 (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daihatsu Copen. (101 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daihatsu Copen.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Daihatsu Copen | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Copen | 2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 61 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56.4 mm | 82 mm |
Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.7 seconds | 15.3 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |