2009 Daihatsu Sirion vs. 2006 Nissan Interstar
To start off, 2009 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Interstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Interstar would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Interstar (112 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Interstar should accelerate faster than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Interstar (290 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. (138 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Interstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. 2009 Daihatsu Sirion has automatic transmission and 2006 Nissan Interstar has manual transmission. 2006 Nissan Interstar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Daihatsu Sirion will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Daihatsu Sirion | 2006 Nissan Interstar | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Nissan |
| Model | Sirion | Interstar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 139 km/hour |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 580 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 100 L |
