2009 Dodge Avenger vs. 1956 Riley RM A
To start off, 2009 Dodge Avenger is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1956 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Dodge Avenger has automatic transmission and 1956 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1956 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Avenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Avenger | 1956 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Dodge | Riley |
| Model | Avenger | RM A |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2870 mm |
