2009 Dodge Avenger vs. 1961 Seat 600
To start off, 2009 Dodge Avenger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Avenger (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1961 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 1961 Seat 600.
Because 1961 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Avenger (166 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Avenger | 1961 Seat 600 | |
Make | Dodge | Seat |
Model | Avenger | 600 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2010 mm |