2009 Dodge Avenger vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Dodge Avenger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Avenger (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Avenger (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Avenger | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Avenger | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 97 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |