2009 Dodge Avenger vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2009 Dodge Avenger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Avenger (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Avenger | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Dodge | Seat |
Model | Avenger | 600 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 225 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2010 mm |