2009 Dodge Avenger vs. 1971 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2009 Dodge Avenger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Avenger (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1971 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 1971 Datsun 240Z.
Because 1971 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Datsun 240Z (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Avenger. (166 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1971 Datsun 240Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Avenger | 1971 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Dodge | Datsun |
Model | Avenger | 240Z |
Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 11 L/100km |