2009 Dodge Avenger vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2009 Dodge Avenger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Avenger. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Avenger.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Avenger. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Avenger | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Avenger | Econoline |
Year Released | 2009 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3510 mm |