2009 Dodge Avenger vs. 2003 Lada Calina 1118
To start off, 2009 Dodge Avenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lada Calina 1118. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lada Calina 1118 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lada Calina 1118. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Dodge Avenger has automatic transmission and 2003 Lada Calina 1118 has manual transmission. 2003 Lada Calina 1118 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Avenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Avenger | 2003 Lada Calina 1118 | |
| Make | Dodge | Lada |
| Model | Avenger | Calina 1118 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2360 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 97 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |
