2009 Dodge Avenger vs. 2003 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Dodge Avenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Avenger (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2003 Volkswagen Polo. (98 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 2003 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volkswagen Polo (240 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Avenger. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Avenger. 2009 Dodge Avenger has automatic transmission and 2003 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 2003 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Avenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Avenger | 2003 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Dodge | Volkswagen |
Model | Avenger | Polo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1895 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 97 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 19.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |