2009 Dodge Caliber vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2009 Dodge Caliber is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Caliber weights approximately 59 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 2009 Dodge Caliber is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Caliber will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Caliber 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Dodge Oldsmobile
Model Caliber Cutlass
Year Released 2009 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1798 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1385 kg 1326 kg
Vehicle Length 4420 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2680 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]