2009 Dodge Caliber vs. 1982 Zastava 750
To start off, 2009 Dodge Caliber is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Caliber is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Caliber (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Caliber should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750.
Because 1982 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Caliber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Caliber (220 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Caliber will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Caliber | 1982 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Dodge | Zastava |
Model | Caliber | 750 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2010 mm |