2009 Dodge Caliber vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2009 Dodge Caliber is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Caliber is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Caliber (154 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Caliber should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Caliber weights approximately 80 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Caliber. (190 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Caliber.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Caliber | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Caliber | CU-X |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 80 L |