2009 Dodge Caliber vs. 2002 Holden UTE

To start off, 2009 Dodge Caliber is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Caliber. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Caliber.

Because 2002 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Caliber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden UTE (306 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Caliber. (170 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2002 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Caliber.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Caliber 2002 Holden UTE
Make Dodge Holden
Model Caliber UTE
Year Released 2009 2002
Body Type Hatchback Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1798 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 204 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 306 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4420 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2950 mm