2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 1955 Jensen Interceptor

To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Jensen Interceptor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Jensen Interceptor would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Jensen Interceptor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1955 Jensen Interceptor. (129 HP @ 3700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1955 Jensen Interceptor.

Let's talk about torque, 1955 Jensen Interceptor (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Challenger. (250 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1955 Jensen Interceptor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Challenger.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Challenger 1955 Jensen Interceptor
Make Dodge Jensen
Model Challenger Interceptor
Year Released 2009 1955
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3518 cc 3993 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 247 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 3700 RPM
Torque 250 Nm 287 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 2200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2860 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]