2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (419 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 403 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 1311 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Challenger (420 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Challenger | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Challenger | R 360 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 6059 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 419 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 55 L |
