2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 would be higher. At 6,332 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 247 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 (500 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Challenger. (250 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Challenger | 1964 Mercedes-Benz 600 | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Challenger | 600 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 6332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 500 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 6250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 112 L |