2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 1973 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1973 Toyota Corona. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1973 Toyota Corona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Challenger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Toyota Corona. (166 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Challenger | 1973 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Challenger | Corona |
Year Released | 2009 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 2252 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2590 mm |