2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Challenger (250 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Challenger | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Challenger | 66 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1550 mm |