2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 1995 Mazda 121

To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 121. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 121.

Because 2009 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Challenger (250 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 121. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 121.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Challenger 1995 Mazda 121
Make Dodge Mazda
Model Challenger 121
Year Released 2009 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3518 cc 1322 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 247 HP 72 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 250 Nm 104 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 3700 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.9:1 9.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 3820 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2460 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 43 L