2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Challenger | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Challenger | Challenger |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2730 mm |