2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Challenger. (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (461 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Challenger. (250 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Challenger | 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Challenger | SL |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 461 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 17.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 80 L |