2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 2002 Volvo S60

To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2002 Volvo S60. (200 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo S60.

Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Challenger. (250 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Challenger.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Challenger 2002 Volvo S60
Make Dodge Volvo
Model Challenger S60
Year Released 2009 2002
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3518 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 247 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 250 Nm 280 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.9:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 70 L