2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Challenger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Challenger | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Challenger | Econoline |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3510 mm |