2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Challenger (250 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Challenger | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Dodge | Proton |
| Model | Challenger | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2610 mm |
