2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 2004 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Corolla. (194 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Corolla.
Because 2009 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Corolla (260 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Challenger. (250 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Corolla will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Challenger | 2004 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Challenger | Corolla |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |
