2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (419 HP) has 177 more horse power than 2010 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Challenger (420 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Challenger | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Challenger | UTE |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6059 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 419 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
