2009 Dodge Challenger vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 2.
Because 2009 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Challenger (250 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 2. 2009 Dodge Challenger has automatic transmission and 2013 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2013 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Challenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Challenger | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Challenger | 2 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1476 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2489 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 43 L |
