2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 600 kg more than 1946 Triumph 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Charger | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Charger | 1800 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1774 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 6.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2550 mm |
