2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1954 Studebaker Champion
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Champion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Champion would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1954 Studebaker Champion. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1954 Studebaker Champion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 312 kg more than 1954 Studebaker Champion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Charger | 1954 Studebaker Champion | |
| Make | Dodge | Studebaker |
| Model | Charger | Champion |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 3032 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2970 mm |
