2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 911 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (191 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Charger | Herald |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2701 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 29 L |