2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1192 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Charger | Fronte |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 66 L |