2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1966 Seat 600

To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1966 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1117 kg more than 1966 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Charger 1966 Seat 600
Make Dodge Seat
Model Charger 600
Year Released 2009 1966
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 3518 cc 765 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 250 HP 24 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 47 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1692 kg 575 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 3300 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1390 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 2010 mm