2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane

To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,722 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (325 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Charger. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 332 kg more than 1967 Mercury Park Lane.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (602 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Charger. (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Charger.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Charger 1967 Mercury Park Lane
Make Dodge Mercury
Model Charger Park Lane
Year Released 2009 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3518 cc 6722 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 250 HP 325 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 602 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1692 kg 1360 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 5560 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1990 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 3130 mm