2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte

To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1252 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (38 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Charger 1967 Suzuki Fronte
Make Dodge Suzuki
Model Charger Fronte
Year Released 2009 1967
Engine Size 3518 cc 356 cc
Horse Power 250 HP 20 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 38 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1692 kg 440 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 3000 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1300 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 1970 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 66 L