2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1970 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1970 Ford Falcon. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 332 kg more than 1970 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Ford Falcon. (259 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Charger 1970 Ford Falcon
Make Dodge Ford
Model Charger Falcon
Year Released 2009 1970
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3518 cc 3273 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 250 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 259 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1692 kg 1360 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 2830 mm