2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 447 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Charger | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |