2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1973 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,589 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1973 Mercury Cougar. (168 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1973 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 363 kg more than 2009 Dodge Charger.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mercury Cougar (375 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Charger. (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1973 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Charger.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Charger 1973 Mercury Cougar
Make Dodge Mercury
Model Charger Cougar
Year Released 2009 1973
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3518 cc 6589 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 250 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 375 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1692 kg 2055 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 5480 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 2910 mm