2009 Dodge Charger vs. 1975 Mazda 616
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1975 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 446 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Charger | 1975 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Charger | 616 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6059 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1960 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2480 mm |